Optimizing the Construction Process of Industrial Maintenance Decision Models by using Predictive Reliability Analysis and RCM Dynamism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71701/f7r75617

Keywords:

Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM), Reliability Analysis (RA), Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Condition Based Maintenance (CBM), Proportional Hazards Model (PHM)

Abstract

A stochastic process, unlike a deterministic process, instead of having one possible reality of how a process can evolve over time, has an indeterminate future evolution. This uncertainty is described by the probability distributions. Failures events in a physical asset follow a random order based on a probability distribution, which is often represented in the reliability analysis as a tool for the maintenance management, whose results would offer decision criteria in order to optimize maintenance strategies. Current reliability analysis (RA) employ data dimensions based on age and failure probability in order to obtain a twodimensional graphic representation (probability density function of failure, PDF) that provides a connection between them and suggesting results that could improve the making-decision criteria. However, if the plan is to optimize maintenance management, it is necessary to assure a record of all the significant available variables to generate solid and coherent samples, in order to build up precise decision models beginning with a multidimensional reliability analysis. The following proposal states that the proper consistency of a sample initiates with the degree of dynamism which the body of knowledge RCM (Reliability Centered Maintenance) links to the daily work orders management, under the CMMS (Computerized Maintenance Management System) or EAM (Enterprise Asset Management), which are not thought to be in favor of a reliability analysis. Work orders will be converted in definition stages for the life cycles and for the FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) records upgrading as new failure modes occurrences appear. In addition to CBM (Condition Based Maintenance) strategies complicity, which will add in the sample relevant predictable variables over the occurred failure modes, which usually are omitted or poorly involved in the two-dimensional PDF graphic, and therefore, are not often considered in the common reliability analysis. Quality of the sample is therefore assured and routinely prepared with the age and condition attributions, which gives a potential predictive model with satisfactory results about the probabilistic forecast, being able to sustain the maintenance strategies employed at the appropriate time and proper component, in order to guarantee, the return on investment (ROI) growth in the industrial plant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abernethy, R. (2004). The New Weibull Handbook. Florida: Dr. Robert B. Albernethy.

Barringer, H. (noviembre, 1995). Where Is My Data for Making Reliability Improvements? Fourth International Conference on Process Plant Reliability, Texas, 14-17.

Birolini, A. (1999). Reliability Engineering. Berlin: Springer y Verlag.

Campbell, J., Jardine, A., y McGlynn, J. (2011). Asset Management Excellence. Nueva York: CRC Press.

Duffuaa, S. Raouf, A., y Campbell, J. (2000). Sistemas de mantenimiento, planeación y control. México D.F.: Limusa Wiley.

Jardine, A., Campbell, J., y Wiseman, M. (2001). Maintenance Excellence, Optimizing Equipment Life Cycle Decisions. Nueva York: Marcel Dekker.

Jardine, A., y Tsang, A. (2013). Maintenance, Replacement and Reliability: Theory and Applications. Nueva York: CRC Press.

Kalbfleisch, J., y Prentice, R. (2002). The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: Wiley.

Mora, A. (2009). Mantenimiento: Planeación, ejecución y control. México D.F.: Alfaomega Grupo Editor.

Moubray, J. (1997). Reliability Centred Maintenance, RCM. Carolina del Norte: Edwards Brothers.

Lugtigheid, D., Banjevic, D., Jardine, A. (enero, 2005). Component repairs: when to perform and what to do. Annual Reliability and Maintenance Symposium, Virginia, 398-403.

RIAC, Reliability Information Analysis Center (2010). Reliability Modeling. New York: RIAC.

Wiseman, M., y Lin, D. (2014). Reliability-Centered Knowledge. Nueva York: CRC Press.

Yang, G. (2007). Life Cycle Reliability Engineering. Nueva Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-11

Issue

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Optimizing the Construction Process of Industrial Maintenance Decision Models by using Predictive Reliability Analysis and RCM Dynamism. (2024). Revista I+i, 12. https://doi.org/10.71701/f7r75617